GoodSync Alternatives for File Synchronization and Transfer

File synchronization and Managed File Transfer (MFT) are essential for organizations handling high volumes of data across multiple locations or teams. GoodSync and Software Pursuits’ SureSync Managed File Transfer are two tools that offer unique capabilities in this space, each with its strengths and limitations.

In this article, we’ll analyze SureSync MFT as a GoodSync alternative by comparing the two solutions regarding job structure, file locking, logging, and status management to help you decide which best suits your needs.

Job Structure: Single vs. Multi-Path Synchronization

One of the fundamental differences between GoodSync and SureSync MFT is their approach to job structure, specifically regarding how they handle synchronization between multiple paths.

GoodSync: Two-Path Synchronization

In GoodSync, jobs are structured as “one-to-one” or “two-way” syncs. For one-way jobs, there is a single source and a single destination. Multi-way jobs (two-way syncs) are limited to two paths. 

You need to create separate jobs for each path to sync data across multiple locations. For example, to sync data across three devices, you’d need two distinct jobs: one between the first two devices and another between the second and third devices. 

This can lead to more setup and management time, especially if you have numerous locations or devices that require syncing.

SureSync MFT: Multi-Path Synchronization

SureSync offers a more flexible approach, allowing multiple paths within a single job. This means you can simultaneously synchronize data across several paths without creating separate jobs for each pair. 
This multi-path capability significantly reduces setup complexity and makes it easier to maintain synchronization across multiple devices, servers, or locations in real-time. 

SureSync’s approach is much more efficient for organizations that rely on syncing across many endpoints.

Takeaway

If you need to synchronize data across more than two locations, SureSync provides a more streamlined and scalable solution.

File Locking: Preventing Conflicts in Shared Environments

File locking is crucial for preventing conflicts in environments where multiple users or applications attempt to access or modify files simultaneously.

GoodSync: No File Locking

GoodSync does not support file locking, which means there is a potential risk of conflicts if multiple users try to edit the same file at the same time. 

In collaborative environments, this lack of file-locking capability can lead to data inconsistencies or overwrite issues, requiring more frequent manual intervention to ensure accuracy.

SureSync MFT: Total File Locking

SureSync MFT supports file locking, which prevents conflicts by locking a file for editing by a single user at a time. Once the user finishes and the file is updated, it becomes available for others to access. 

This feature is particularly valuable for organizations with multiple team members working on shared files or using applications that require simultaneous access to files across different locations.

Takeaway

For collaborative environments where file access conflicts need to be minimized, SureSync’s file-locking feature offers a considerable advantage over GoodSync.

Logging Capabilities: Filtering and Detailed Logs

Detailed logging is essential for tracking sync and transfer processes, identifying issues, and ensuring compliance. Both GoodSync and SureSync provide logging, but the level of detail and functionality varies.

GoodSync: Plain Text Files

GoodSync logs are saved as plain text .log files. While this provides a basic level of visibility, filtering and searching for specific information can be challenging. 

For example, if you want to review only error messages or track a particular file, you would need to manually search through the log file, which can be time-consuming and error-prone, especially in environments with high logging volume.

SureSync MFT: In-depth Filtering and Search

SureSync takes logging to the next level by allowing you to search logs for individual files, filter logs based on specific criteria (like error-only messages), and access logs from within a user-friendly interface. 

The enhanced filtering and search functionality in SureSync makes it much easier to identify issues, monitor specific files, and ensure you’re quickly alerted to any potential problems in the sync process.

Takeaway

SureSync’s detailed and filterable logs provide far greater control over monitoring and troubleshooting than the plain text logs in GoodSync.

Status Panels: Visibility into Sync Processes

When managing file synchronization, real-time visibility into the status of each sync job is essential for proactive management and issue resolution.

GoodSync: Basic Status Information

GoodSync provides basic status information for jobs, but the display is limited in terms of customization and depth. This means you can check the status of each job, but you won’t get the granular, rich information needed to monitor complex environments effectively.

SureSync MFT: Detailed Job Information

SureSync offers more robust status panels that provide detailed information on each job and path involved in synchronization. This panel can display a variety of metrics, including active jobs, progress indicators, error notifications, synchronization backlog, and status alerts. There is even an Enterprise Status panel that can display Jobs across multiple SureSync servers in a consolidated view and a web-based version for 

With these features, administrators have a comprehensive view of each job’s status, allowing for faster issue identification and resolution.

Takeaway

SureSync’s enhanced status panel gives a much clearer and more detailed view of ongoing processes, making it ideal for organizations that require high visibility into sync operations.

Which Tool is Right for You?

Both GoodSync and SureSync MFT are powerful file synchronization tools, but they serve different needs. Choose SureSync MFT for your GoodSync alternative if:

• You require multi-path synchronization in a single job, especially across multiple locations or teams.
• Your organization relies on file locking to prevent conflicts in a collaborative environment.
• You need advanced logging with filter and search options for better monitoring.
• You want a comprehensive status panel for real-time visibility into your sync jobs.

In essence, if your organization’s synchronization and file transfer needs are complex, SureSync MFT provides the depth, visibility, and flexibility to manage multi-location syncs with ease, making it an excellent GoodSync alternative. 

Meanwhile, GoodSync is a reliable solution for users with more straightforward, smaller-scale sync requirements.

Ultimately, the choice between GoodSync vs SureSync MFT will depend on your organization’s specific requirements, particularly regarding scalability, logging, and collaboration.

Software Pursuits experts want to hear your challenges and help come up with real solutions to address your challenges. We recommend trying SureSync MFT free for 30 days and connecting with us to discuss your best options.